A remarkable artist from the 1950s, Art Frahm, had a recurrent motif in his artwork: ladies in distress due to the unexpected losA remarkable artist from the 1950s, Art Frahm, had a recurrent motif in his artwork: ladies in distress due to the unexpected loss of their panties while ogling men enjoy their predicament! You can Google this artist's name to see some examples of his style and works should you so desire.
In looking at the scene depicted, very clearly, the heroine is dismayed. But her unsympathetic onlookers are not. But what is the reason for this motif? There are several possibilities that I would like to discuss.
1) It is an antifeminist statement. It is intended as a cautionary lesson against intruding into what were male perserves because of the possibility of panty mortification! However, this argument seems invalid in that many of his pictures depict women doing typically female activity such as grocery shopping. For some reason, celery is recurrently depicted also.
2) It is a mild risqué artistic work; a substitute for the lush 19th century nudes that a pre-Puritan time permitted. After all, porn and irony did not come into being until the 1990s. By putting the heroine in a ridulous situation, it disarms the viewer and causes him to see it as amusing. Furthermore, the typical male did not usually have any experience with prurient garments as granny panties unless they had been married for a substantial amount of time, ten years or more.
3) Ultimately, this is simply an expression of the short life span that the elastic of the time had, a then-developing technology in which Art Frahm revealed its imprefections! To cite as support for this I cite the easy acceptance of blue jeans as feminine garb. Wearing jeans took a lot of the existential worry out of appearing in public!
4) Finally, the type of panties of the 1950s might have been part of the problem. Grannies, because of their weight, result in more downward stress on the elastic. However, by the use of lighter material and briefer panties, the incidence of panty failures diminished dramatically. Therefore, the progression from granny panties to panties, to bikini briefs to thongs represents superior technological developments as well as social more change!s of their panties while ogling men enjoy their predicament! You can Google this artist's name to see some examples of his style and works should you so desire.
In looking at the scene depicted, very clearly, the heroine is dismayed. But her unsympathetic onlookers are not. But what is the reason for this motif? There are several possibilities that I would like to discuss.
1) It is an antifeminist statement. It is intended as a cautionary lesson against intruding into what were male perserves because of the possibility of panty mortification! However, this argument seems invalid in that many of his pictures depict women doing typically female activity such as grocery shopping. For some reason, celery is recurrently depicted also.
2) It is a mild risqué artistic work; a substitute for the lush 19th century nudes that a pre-Puritan time permitted. After all, porn and irony did not come into being until the 1990s. By putting the heroine in a ridulous situation, it disarms the viewer and causes him to see it as amusing. Furthermore, the typical male did not usually have any experience with prurient garments as granny panties unless they had been married for a substantial amount of time, ten years or more.
3) Ultimately, this is simply an expression of the short life span that the elastic of the time had, a then-developing technology in which Art Frahm revealed its imprefections! To cite as support for this I cite the easy acceptance of blue jeans as feminine garb. Wearing jeans took a lot of the existential worry out of appearing in public!
4) Finally, the type of panties of the 1950s might have been part of the problem. Grannies, because of their weight, result in more downward stress on the elastic. However, by the use of lighter material and briefer panties, the incidence of panty failures diminished dramatically. Therefore, the progression from granny panties to panties, to bikini briefs to thongs represents superior technological developments as well as social more change!
Sunday, March 22, 2020
Thursday, January 16, 2020
Skin the Bunny
Okay, I've seen a few things in my time. On one infamous road trip the Chili Dog Sisters sojourned to Atmore, TN to that haunt of depravity: the Boobie Bungalow, Yes, and even participated in an amateur night at one of the clubs in that unhallowed part of the Volunteer State!
However, it was in a club in darkest Idaho that I found the nadir of games: skin the bunny!
How is this played? You find the damnedest things on the internet; and the Urban Dictionary* came across. To-wit:
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=skin+the+bunny&defid=1774758
I was strictly an observer to this depraved spectacle. I was not the bunny!
I must say that most of the participants were in varying degrees of intoxication and rated a D.U.I. if motoring.
Geesh! I feel like a censorious old lady! Maybe the Methodists might take me in. Or the Four Square Gospel congregation.
*You occasionally get good info in this participatory web site. But not often.
However, it was in a club in darkest Idaho that I found the nadir of games: skin the bunny!
How is this played? You find the damnedest things on the internet; and the Urban Dictionary* came across. To-wit:
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=skin+the+bunny&defid=1774758
I was strictly an observer to this depraved spectacle. I was not the bunny!
I must say that most of the participants were in varying degrees of intoxication and rated a D.U.I. if motoring.
Geesh! I feel like a censorious old lady! Maybe the Methodists might take me in. Or the Four Square Gospel congregation.
*You occasionally get good info in this participatory web site. But not often.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)